public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/94308] New: [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper
@ 2020-03-24 18:25 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-24 18:31 ` [Bug target/94308] [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper since r10-6451 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-24 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94308
Bug ID: 94308
Summary: [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with
vzeroupper
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -mfpmath=sse -mavx2 -mfma" } */
#include <x86intrin.h>
void
foo (float *x, const float *y, const float *z, unsigned int w)
{
unsigned int a;
const unsigned int b = w / 8;
const float *c = y;
const float *d = z;
__m256 e = _mm256_setzero_ps ();
__m256 f, g;
for (a = 0; a < b; a++)
{
f = _mm256_loadu_ps (c);
g = _mm256_loadu_ps (d);
c += 8;
d += 8;
e = _mm256_fmadd_ps (f, g, e);
}
__attribute__ ((aligned (32))) float h[8];
_mm256_storeu_ps (h, e);
_mm256_zeroupper ();
float i = h[0] + h[1] + h[2] + h[3] + h[4] + h[5] + h[6] + h[7];
for (a = b * 8; a < w; a++)
i += (*c++) * (*d++);
*x = i;
}
ICEs on i686-linux or x86_64-linux with -m32.
The problem is that the vzeroupper pass in this case fills in sets for all
xmm0..xmm7 regs, but doesn't force rerecognition of the insn, so it is still
considered avx_vzeroupper_1, but the splitter doesn't trigger for it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/94308] [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper since r10-6451
2020-03-24 18:25 [Bug target/94308] New: [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-03-24 18:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-24 18:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-24 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94308
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[10 Regression] ICE in |[10 Regression] ICE in
|final_scan_insn_1 with |final_scan_insn_1 with
|vzeroupper |vzeroupper since r10-6451
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Last reconfirmed| |2020-03-24
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with my r10-6451-gb7b3378f91c0641f2ef4d88db22af62a571c9359 change.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/94308] [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper since r10-6451
2020-03-24 18:25 [Bug target/94308] New: [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-24 18:31 ` [Bug target/94308] [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper since r10-6451 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-03-24 18:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-25 7:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-24 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94308
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 48109
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48109&action=edit
gcc10-pr94308.patch
Untested fix.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/94308] [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper since r10-6451
2020-03-24 18:25 [Bug target/94308] New: [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-24 18:31 ` [Bug target/94308] [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper since r10-6451 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-24 18:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-03-25 7:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-25 10:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-25 10:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-25 7:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94308
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/94308] [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper since r10-6451
2020-03-24 18:25 [Bug target/94308] New: [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-25 7:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-03-25 10:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-25 10:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-25 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94308
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5ad8ee04a78b576867fd78b2f25201ea6b4aae1
commit r10-7373-gd5ad8ee04a78b576867fd78b2f25201ea6b4aae1
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Mar 25 11:40:00 2020 +0100
i386: Fix ix86_add_reg_usage_to_vzeroupper [PR94308]
The following patch ICEs due to my recent change r10-6451-gb7b3378f91c.
Since that patch, for explicit vzeroupper in the sources (when an intrinsic
is used), we start with the *avx_vzeroupper_1 pattern which contains just
the
UNSPECV_VZEROUPPER and no sets/clobbers. The vzeroupper pass then adds
some
sets to those, but doesn't add clobbers and finally there is an
&& epilogue_completed splitter that splits this into the *avx_vzeroupper
pattern which has the right number of sets/clobbers (16 on 64-bit, 8 on
32-bit) + the UNSPECV_VZEROUPPER first.
The problem with this testcase on !TARGET_64BIT is that the vzeroupper pass
adds 8 sets to the pattern, i.e. the maximum number, but INSN_CODE stays
to be the one of the *avx_vzeroupper_1 pattern. The splitter doesn't do
anything here, because it sees the number of rtxes in the PARALLEL already
the right count, but during final we see that the *avx_vzeroupper_1 pattern
has "#" output template and ICE that we forgot to split it.
The following patch fixes it by forcing re-recognition of the insn after we
make the changes to it in ix86_add_reg_usage_to_vzeroupper. Anything that
will call recog_memoized later on will recog it and find out it is in this
case already *avx_vzeroupper rather than *avx_vzeroupper_1.
2020-03-25 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR target/94308
* config/i386/i386-features.c (ix86_add_reg_usage_to_vzeroupper):
Set
INSN_CODE (insn) to -1 when changing the pattern.
* gcc.target/i386/pr94308.c: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/94308] [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper since r10-6451
2020-03-24 18:25 [Bug target/94308] New: [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-25 10:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-03-25 10:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-25 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94308
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-03-25 10:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-24 18:25 [Bug target/94308] New: [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-24 18:31 ` [Bug target/94308] [10 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1 with vzeroupper since r10-6451 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-24 18:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-25 7:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-25 10:40 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-25 10:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).