From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 793E7394443B; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:08:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 793E7394443B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1585130930; bh=AHKtEOuv5mcofOYtsLVrsOJEo6I6DbNMu+0JIjkDKx0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=win6BGuldxIbOMhtYPYSBFDNz4IszksvUnBSsjt/3Z5Qrw0AQmaYb96DlQYFPdfQy DfD+JrKeMdAFARg+auJ2ejde6ruxwKUAGeZiVvbSaGc7USrXp3qs5+IUybTAY4PiPG Kkdy5h2y2I+8cJLqCXP0D+y7UfDckqZ+NEyHh+QU= From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/94314] [10 Regression] Optimizing mismatched new/delete pairs since r10-2106-g6343b6bf3bb83c87 Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:08:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed short_desc cc cf_known_to_work cf_reconfirmed_on assigned_to bug_status cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:08:50 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94314 Martin Li=C5=A1ka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|[10 Regression] Optimizing |[10 Regression] Optimizing |mismatched new/delete pairs |mismatched new/delete pairs | |since | |r10-2106-g6343b6bf3bb83c87 CC| |redi at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work| |9.3.0 Last reconfirmed| |2020-03-25 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot g= nu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Known to fail| |10.0 --- Comment #3 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- Yes, I remember we discussed the topic about the user-provided new/delete implementations. Can please Jason or Jonathan comment about the test-case?=