public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug d/94315] New: [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail
@ 2020-03-25 1:50 seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2020-03-25 7:55 ` [Bug d/94315] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com @ 2020-03-25 1:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94315
Bug ID: 94315
Summary: [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and
gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
Reporter: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
Target Milestone: ---
g: 4a01f7b1e73e98a86520d8a825ddd3777faa7c33
r10-7320
These fail on all powerpc64 targets.
I don't know what these tests are really supposed to be doing so I am not sure
what is wrong.
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O0 scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O0 -frelease scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d
[ \\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O0 -frelease -g scan-file pr93038.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038.d [ \\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O0 -g scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O1 scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O1 -frelease scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d
[ \\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O1 -frelease -g scan-file pr93038.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038.d [ \\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O1 -g scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O2 scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O2 -frelease scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d
[ \\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O2 -frelease -g scan-file pr93038.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038.d [ \\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O2 -g scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O3 scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O3 -frelease scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d
[ \\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O3 -frelease -g scan-file pr93038.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038.d [ \\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -O3 -g scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -Os scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -Os -frelease scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d
[ \\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -Os -frelease -g scan-file pr93038.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038.d [ \\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038.d -Os -g scan-file pr93038.o: [^\n]*/pr93038.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O0 scan-file pr93038b.o: [^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O0 -frelease scan-file pr93038b.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O0 -frelease -g scan-file pr93038b.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O0 -g scan-file pr93038b.o: [^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O1 scan-file pr93038b.o: [^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O1 -frelease scan-file pr93038b.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O1 -frelease -g scan-file pr93038b.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O1 -g scan-file pr93038b.o: [^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O2 scan-file pr93038b.o: [^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O2 -frelease scan-file pr93038b.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O2 -frelease -g scan-file pr93038b.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O2 -g scan-file pr93038b.o: [^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O3 scan-file pr93038b.o: [^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O3 -frelease scan-file pr93038b.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O3 -frelease -g scan-file pr93038b.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -O3 -g scan-file pr93038b.o: [^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -Os scan-file pr93038b.o: [^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -Os -frelease scan-file pr93038b.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -Os -frelease -g scan-file pr93038b.o:
[^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
FAIL: gdc.dg/pr93038b.d -Os -g scan-file pr93038b.o: [^\n]*/pr93038b.d [
\\\\\n]*[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt\n\n[^\n]*/fileimports/pr93038.txt:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/94315] [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail
2020-03-25 1:50 [Bug d/94315] New: [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
@ 2020-03-25 7:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-25 10:16 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-25 7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94315
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/94315] [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail
2020-03-25 1:50 [Bug d/94315] New: [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2020-03-25 7:55 ` [Bug d/94315] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-03-25 10:16 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-25 15:56 ` law at redhat dot com
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-25 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94315
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2020-03-25
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/94315] [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail
2020-03-25 1:50 [Bug d/94315] New: [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2020-03-25 7:55 ` [Bug d/94315] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-25 10:16 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-03-25 15:56 ` law at redhat dot com
2020-04-01 17:46 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2020-03-25 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94315
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |law at redhat dot com
Priority|P3 |P4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/94315] [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail
2020-03-25 1:50 [Bug d/94315] New: [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-25 15:56 ` law at redhat dot com
@ 2020-04-01 17:46 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
2020-04-01 21:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org @ 2020-04-01 17:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94315
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> ---
The test generates a make dependency file, and scans that it succeeded.
I can only think that there's something about where you build makes the
generated file different.
Maybe it looks like this?
pr93038.o: \
/path/to/pr93038.d \
/path/to/fileimports/pr93038.txt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/94315] [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail
2020-03-25 1:50 [Bug d/94315] New: [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-01 17:46 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
@ 2020-04-01 21:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-01 21:47 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
2020-04-02 20:17 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-04-01 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94315
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:918b89b7623b6c42b09f37b7e3ef807d1abbabb8
commit r10-7505-g918b89b7623b6c42b09f37b7e3ef807d1abbabb8
Author: Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org>
Date: Wed Apr 1 23:37:06 2020 +0200
d: Fix new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail
The scan-file match is likely too strict to always succeed, so instead
have split it up into a set of smaller matches.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR d/94315
* gdc.dg/pr93038.d: Split dg-final into multiple tests.
* gdc.dg/pr93038b.d: Likewise.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/94315] [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail
2020-03-25 1:50 [Bug d/94315] New: [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-01 21:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-04-01 21:47 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
2020-04-02 20:17 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org @ 2020-04-01 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94315
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> ---
I've relaxed the match string in scan-file. Can you verify it's fine?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug d/94315] [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail
2020-03-25 1:50 [Bug d/94315] New: [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2020-04-01 21:47 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
@ 2020-04-02 20:17 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com @ 2020-04-02 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94315
Bill Seurer <seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer <seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com> ---
Looks like they are all cleaned up now. Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-02 20:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-25 1:50 [Bug d/94315] New: [10 regression] new tests gdc.dg/pr93038.d and gdc.dg/pr93038b.d in r10-7320 fail seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
2020-03-25 7:55 ` [Bug d/94315] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-25 10:16 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-25 15:56 ` law at redhat dot com
2020-04-01 17:46 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
2020-04-01 21:43 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-01 21:47 ` ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
2020-04-02 20:17 ` seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).