From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 722B2385E016; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:12:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 722B2385E016
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1585213933;
 bh=urXMIgwvzjxxFBBFQZpvis5iBc002L2SoN3eyyd8Tng=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=qbNTJ8aGChHsDz7j/MjcNQUrWr8cNrmxh0lApqFLQbGq4+8XEGZpVjUCR8sEJx3K3
 EgX/MTMrX36c8WZ2vyMgpTa9XPY+28QWCgPzcYzJWVBgjRe9EeU0yVO/zWKIr61OD6
 RpwrlP2d03z640j6tyDpLDt2FK65dU66uqu0LQGQ=
From: "vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/94337] Incorrect "dereferencing type-punned pointer will
 break strict-aliasing rules" warning
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:12:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94337-4-Lj3MHTUK3U@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94337-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94337-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 09:12:13 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94337

--- Comment #2 from Vincent Lef=C3=A8vre <vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net> ---
Why not having a level with no false positives? This would avoid to disable=
 the
warning globally.

IMHO, using it when a union is involved is likely to generate false positiv=
es.=