From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id AA8A8385E012; Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:07:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AA8A8385E012
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1585292828;
 bh=P1vkboNhUn4wKa5NcUqdnGV+77kKpr4248bVSdS7NHI=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=VKVmPPotY5Qni3iJwszJgoC7/o1nNY6vOcq4rD0YDSW/DbK/XrfGtwfIERHwM0Mgp
 xbxa9aXf8JL3a/C9HVYiMc0Scl9XJVmEpdnFZELs4y6f3CDC3BO2Kj0O6yjH3eEehh
 vobpKciqx4LKE6GLY9/E5EPyY/DkST8WW9ElOht0=
From: "jbeulich at suse dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/94343] [10 Regression] invalid AVX512VL vpternlogd
 instruction emitted for -march=knl
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:07:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeulich at suse dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94343-4-6OsLewn2Iz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94343-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94343-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 07:07:08 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94343

--- Comment #12 from jbeulich at suse dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Created attachment 48128 [details]
> gcc10-pr94343.patch
>=20
> Updated patch.  A variant to that would be 4 separate patterns I guess, n=
ot
> sure if that would be shorter.

May I suggest that the testcases also check for the 0x55 immediate? The
potential of VPTERNLOG allows for much wider use (with different immediates=
) in
principle, so the correct choice of immediate would imo better be validated
here as well.=