From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 38C46388A008; Thu,  2 Apr 2020 11:51:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 38C46388A008
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1585828275;
 bh=4i6hv9oIOV+jjt2MHAUDdQykgnS3Wl9fdlTV443En00=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=WzzRhZT56i4bKE4sPnykRJTrC6hyg8OPnjhAIuWO8toxA9e5bOY/GT60m0RBV1hz0
 G6ErVW/ncSipkxxuL/9leFmPYhowqyHI5frwpT8RXy33nldGPXAZg2FtaSZGP8zAnR
 /K+jyNjbyFM/X991xN4qRfaQNbtROTgkdeclzzJo=
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/94359] new test case
 g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C fails
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:51:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-94359-4-RB8lH3IuwH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94359-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94359-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:51:15 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94359

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg

--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8)
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #7)
> > I'm seeing the same failure on Solaris/SPARC (32 and 64-bit).
>=20
> Do you have any info on why the tail-call fails there?
> (e.g. is it not possible to make an indirect tail-call in the ABI, as see=
ms
> to be the case for powerpc64 & AIX).

No.  I guess Eric (Cc'ed) is in a better position to answer that.=