From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 1E4E9388A03C; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 17:38:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1E4E9388A03C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1585849119; bh=l/EI1lZFW4JMA3iY9wyAwxBeVAsnc9Wl4V+dGk83snQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=vrL3K8dyeBtP69XgkW57EYXkxhIMjekSYvppFXi3SKga2Phf6RMnn20DZJi1dKnOf 8HPPpz+iMM0Eaxh6HX87Y45C3/jmV5PPuidnD0Hyb/0qqS9Ix9OUQeRYR3LDq0oUTA n2lnhZ6WOVk4du+I0cM8cTk/7Mp50+t7JdBwFS5o= From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/94359] new test case g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C fails Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 17:38:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 17:38:39 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94359 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- > No. I guess Eric (Cc'ed) is in a better position to answer that. Same as for PowerPC: look at the function_ok_for_sibcall predicate.=