From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A59FB385B835; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:33:11 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A59FB385B835 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1585611191; bh=mOr38dfistk17Umn4WFz1KzjtzJhu0nx1rc+6Fhaglw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sWcDj/6484r8NBKEMnOBKwFevBuVXJFBz4Mt3XTDtZRLF+JfM4InjriIEUGY32wpF HKkPvz2songej+5ZbJ9PX20TseA6D3zO0dYauDG/XFeadXgmkpWA7i5sNLC0gFfx0D 0A0mr2qB1nwe9EV1NdjqO3nxd3sa7nIr7A2x5G/w= From: "yshuiv7 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/94391] gcc refers to absolute symbols with R_X86_64_PC32 relocation Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:33:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: yshuiv7 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 23:33:11 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94391 Yuxuan Shui changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED --- Comment #19 from Yuxuan Shui --- comment #8 claims C variables cannot refer to ABS symbols without substanti= ate that claim. comment #9 suggests a change that is just wrong. Reopening as previous WONTFIX/WORKSFORME resolutions are not valid.=