From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 725BD385C017; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:12:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 725BD385C017
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1585638724;
 bh=XUxhyTl9Z8/9337z8dohtZpqlWSDn+ln48jnJ10TXCI=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=aGEB4cyI/+/OYTCi1PYy+K+ATOjgCfO6zCN9dkqAzE87enk7kpWvswx5bhXXZJSJ/
 otFctD++CiDTvZPmgjFmmoTUK+ovMgr/RXshZQEKS/Sgw5XI+SYWVYHw7v2ZmeXCpM
 Aii6II7inwO/KclUvfeLUpq5nYt29pc7DVoaqMlI=
From: "markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/94397] [10 Regression] the compiler consider "type is(
 real(kind(1.)) )" as a syntax error since r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:12:04 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94397-4-gH1j2cCg3F@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94397-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94397-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 07:12:04 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94397

--- Comment #4 from markeggleston at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The compilation error reported is due this change in PR93484:

--- a/gcc/fortran/match.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/match.c
@@ -2222,9 +2222,9 @@ gfc_match_type_spec (gfc_typespec *ts)

 found:

-      m =3D gfc_match_init_expr (&e);
+      m =3D gfc_match_expr (&e);

Changing it back causes test cases ISO_Fortran_binding_11.f90 and pr78033.f=
90
to fail.

If "kind=3D" is found gfc_match_init_expr (&e) should be used and when it i=
s not
gfc_match_expr (&e).

I'm checking a suitable test case and will have a patch ready soon.=