public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug gcov-profile/94410] New: 511.povray_r is 11% slower built at -O2 PGO+LTO than with GCC 9 and same options
@ 2020-03-30 17:53 jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-30 17:58 ` [Bug gcov-profile/94410] " jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-30 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94410
Bug ID: 94410
Summary: 511.povray_r is 11% slower built at -O2 PGO+LTO than
with GCC 9 and same options
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks: 26163
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-linux
Target: x86_64-linux
SPEC 2017 FPrate benchmark 511.povray_r runs 11 % slower on AMD Zen2
CPU and 10% slower on Intel Cascade Lake server CPU when built with
-O2 (generic march/tuning) and both PGO and LTO with trunk (revision
26b3e568a60) than when compiled with the same options with GCC 9.
Bisecting revealed that the slowdown was introduced with:
commit 2925cad2151842daa387950e62d989090e47c91d
Author: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Date: Thu Oct 3 17:08:21 2019 +0200
params.def (PARAM_INLINE_HEURISTICS_HINT_PERCENT, [...]): New.
* params.def (PARAM_INLINE_HEURISTICS_HINT_PERCENT,
PARAM_INLINE_HEURISTICS_HINT_PERCENT_O2): New.
* doc/invoke.texi (inline-heuristics-hint-percent,
inline-heuristics-hint-percent-O2): Document.
* tree-inline.c (inline_insns_single, inline_insns_auto): Add new
hint attribute.
(can_inline_edge_by_limits_p): Use it.
From-SVN: r276516
The revision just before it was even 9% and 7% faster than GCC 9 on
AMD and Intel respectively.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
[Bug 26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k17, 2k and 2k6 and 95)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug gcov-profile/94410] 511.povray_r is 11% slower built at -O2 PGO+LTO than with GCC 9 and same options
2020-03-30 17:53 [Bug gcov-profile/94410] New: 511.povray_r is 11% slower built at -O2 PGO+LTO than with GCC 9 and same options jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-03-30 17:58 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-30 20:17 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-18 17:52 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-30 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94410
Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
| |a/show_bug.cgi?id=94360
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
PR94360 is another O2 PGO+LTO bug where the commit caused a slowdown.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug gcov-profile/94410] 511.povray_r is 11% slower built at -O2 PGO+LTO than with GCC 9 and same options
2020-03-30 17:53 [Bug gcov-profile/94410] New: 511.povray_r is 11% slower built at -O2 PGO+LTO than with GCC 9 and same options jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-30 17:58 ` [Bug gcov-profile/94410] " jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-03-30 20:17 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-18 17:52 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-30 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94410
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For the record, SPEC 2006 453.povray is similarly affected, the commit
makes it run 26% slower.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug gcov-profile/94410] 511.povray_r is 11% slower built at -O2 PGO+LTO than with GCC 9 and same options
2020-03-30 17:53 [Bug gcov-profile/94410] New: 511.povray_r is 11% slower built at -O2 PGO+LTO than with GCC 9 and same options jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-30 17:58 ` [Bug gcov-profile/94410] " jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-30 20:17 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-01-18 17:52 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-01-18 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94410
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is still the case, as can be seen on LNT (GCC 9 is the dot in the left
bottom corner):
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=690.467.0&plot.1=745.467.0&plot.2=777.467.0&plot.3=687.467.0&
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-18 17:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-30 17:53 [Bug gcov-profile/94410] New: 511.povray_r is 11% slower built at -O2 PGO+LTO than with GCC 9 and same options jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-30 17:58 ` [Bug gcov-profile/94410] " jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-03-30 20:17 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-01-18 17:52 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).