From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A1B30385BF86; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:38:54 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A1B30385BF86 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1585665534; bh=VnvHxjJWPjrY4T/hbA1TZEEAk499s9R/shx8l7ccVw8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=yM6XNBQ0x6EdFUq/FPR+nHKAlQa+e54oXh8mne8Hsgityw+xVWee/jKDEQ52gPMIc 7jcUabgIbYU94/yGe4wVOHLEmAjqS2OKkadT4VOk5Ets2FCkFc7X2MOf62sDlJUtA1 A3iv0r0QfDQGcelLw6ffB1kTT08shg5uIBhGdbyk= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/94420] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE error: insn does not satisfy its constraints Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:38:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:38:54 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94420 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- So shouldn't predicate on that operand verify the same thing as the constra= int does (or insn condition)?=