From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8FB7A385DC09; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 06:59:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8FB7A385DC09 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1585724395; bh=lq2p2XOBh08ZtNoYEhkGiyJq8tJzM5jn7qDsGZ94t7M=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LpMO5BsKxBumW1+ZGyUK+QkgYP8wvZcoqLSuPojtRxwiDPzlO3ZMU+i1H9tNKPGit hGxdJ+bwQgTRlKhq4CK45+3UpeQ1rhkAewpcFjqGd+1BizKmse8gv888nc0+TycHQj 8PfqOpP1kHo3FKnVy/2PXGQdZTk6jpmgMihO5D4k= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug d/94425] [D] Consider always settings ASM_VOLATILE_P on asm statements Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 06:59:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: d X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 06:59:55 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94425 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Well, there's no dependence visible to the compiler between the control word stores and loads so it's obvious the asms cannot be pure. Is 'asm' a D feature or a GCC extension? How does D model dependences between asms?=