From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id B728C385BF92; Wed,  1 Apr 2020 14:07:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B728C385BF92
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1585750072;
 bh=rG8ZMVkPdxcfTK40QNT2G9QA0I+Uyr9jpMAuvnxP3ww=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=ror8C1fKQDWnOZEk7mUF/oYQXHm3H1BDMEyv9jSO9DTMPFf/BukcoSvmMG7KbaHN5
 j4pBSHgqOf3irH62e0wydSTak5yEKeGaUv8/PLDZUFmtZ/j9eAHxvxvSCdSez8cnO6
 +ZjLVqLEWFhwsTZ/9TVrTfFSPtg7V+ThOQERmSKU=
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/94440] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in
 check_bool_attrs, at recog.c:2168 since r7-5324-gb8cab8a5492e9639
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 14:07:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94440-4-7DZuBSqrLu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94440-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94440-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 14:07:52 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94440

--- Comment #4 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> So, either we need to consider also -ffast-math options to be part of tar=
get
> and force different this_target_recog if it changes between functions, or
> the i386 backend can't use enabled attribute for the fast-math dependent
> checks.

By reverting the referred change, we risk PR78738. Considering that -ffast-=
math
flags are not current optimization level flags, I'd vote for handling these
flags.=