From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 6A4E4385DC0B; Wed,  1 Apr 2020 14:09:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6A4E4385DC0B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1585750184;
 bh=aTBWCabJJx2VUsxbAb8gZFdzhSyVcftPffQrXI9YNY8=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=uAoQKwgkkH3/LHbscvzAJtO3mnaYlHMMZKTOZY5tQk8uuhnYd9g3azUtJk9nQJ1SK
 PhyxV6sUW8WWh6aTNhCFUI7v/QAgHCN31ko5Id+M2PeFhKS5C0052xfn+FVzkcJlQR
 07CPE3dYWs6kKoMWa4mQQ4agY2M9Dr8F1TUObY5s=
From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/94440] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in
 check_bool_attrs, at recog.c:2168 since r7-5324-gb8cab8a5492e9639
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 14:09:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also
Message-ID: <bug-94440-4-DUiQr8eIIm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94440-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94440-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 14:09:44 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94440

Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92860

--- Comment #5 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
We do have quite some known issues in PR92860 where a target optimization
influences optimization options (and vice versa). I tried to fix some of th=
em
but yes, it's really a mess and non-trivial.=