From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 0FBFA388A008; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 11:43:07 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0FBFA388A008 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1585827787; bh=syaIx/0iLM2elH5KGgpFPMYIdk2vfwc7fyLeRMppZH8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dqLEHN0A/ecrBoBjiCjRLH1Fa+rllaw4b2ppSaqbZUMLZ5POF04g+LUOsaN4RsyE5 g5hgoj00dpNBw1Xi54P+F9jA8+dVcoWcIlMZgtQpIFUqmSbBrgkHS1VenmnNBMiVtX MvhsBV09d9W4klJlcz4NR/vtO9JP4Pr7OY3DEBS8= From: "avieira at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/94445] gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-15.c fails for cortex-m33 Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:43:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 11:43:07 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94445 --- Comment #5 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yeah... So far I have checked that 'gimplify_call_expr' creates the right gimple, a= nd up until 'gimplify_modify_expr' I can verify it does by using gimple_call_fntype . Though at expansion time, the 'gimple_call_fntype (stmt)' of '_5 =3D s_bar_= p_2(D) (); [tail call]' now has the attribute ... So it must go wrong somewhere between gimplification and expansion, but tha= t's a big window and dump files won't help us :(=