From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D18D0388A014; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:58:38 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D18D0388A014 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1585821518; bh=8TVqZNmdyuE1c420JgR28lzcSq7fTbo4ItMfEWRrVVU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=SdH5UFkzNF7zJfwVgJVGDs+r9UP/d+O2UniRiEbxtnIaTWpdLZOQ4zeeblI10czmO wzA+pekSYzGHKeKOEZEGXD1Ko7/OjdbdBTNSg5ChG4Ovby/EXSq8u+Wb9BEVwsUbO9 jSu6/RHYCt6tNWZrutLEGKma5ptZSCa/WoQ8K1I0= From: "avieira at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/94445] gcc.target/arm/cmse/cmse-15.c fails for cortex-m33 Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 09:58:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 09:58:38 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94445 avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2020-04-02 --- Comment #1 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Christophe, This looks to me like an issue of not building distinct types for the ns_fo= o_t and s_bar_t function types. When I first wrote this code I tested for this and it was working, so I am wondering whether changes have been made in the way we create types in the c-frontend. I am trying to find out how all this works again, its been a while...=