From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 6A8F13877034; Thu,  2 Apr 2020 08:26:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6A8F13877034
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1585816008;
 bh=BULuJLvzSDCN/+Q6xEJ4ePjtf2mhDUN3baOYNNCsS0c=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=GovST4+YtMgp0oI5G/YV2ESaLFFW9Uf3Wa8msom8MEfXYF4Xnd6/9CbL1R/R+PXOG
 YLv6Uz4G6KI8CqHCBCwiYuGlzRSdJwiVXWgMnxSMd8tLICPMVXbEddWebKSawaWrhw
 gBtVMez4Ui17M+AVzGnQfPWK8zVt7OJRkrSpr4Ds=
From: "chen3.liu at intel dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?W0J1ZyB0YXJnZXQvOTQ0NTJdIEkzODYgQUJJOiBIb3cgdG8gZGV0?=
 =?UTF-8?B?ZXJtaW5lIHRoZSBhbGlnbm1lbnQgb2Ygc3RydWN0IG9yIHVuaW9uIGRldGVy?=
 =?UTF-8?B?bWluZWQgd2hlbiBwYXNzZXMgdGhlbSBvbiBzdGFja++8nw==?=
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 08:26:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: chen3.liu at intel dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94452-4-CDL6ycuQND@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94452-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94452-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 08:26:48 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94452

--- Comment #2 from ChenLiu <chen3.liu at intel dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I see gx aligned to 64 bytes (as I expected).  Can you be more specific as
> to what target you tested?

I tested on i386 target. I think you may misunderstand what I mean. The gx =
will
align to 4 byte when passing it on stack. I think this should belong to cal=
ling
conventions.=