public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/94469] lto abstract variable emitted as concrete decl (ada test-case) Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 11:27:40 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-94469-4-oC2Uf5j5PF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-94469-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94469 --- Comment #8 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > > Btw, I still wonder how it works with abstract functions, inline and > > concrete instances. Works in gdb, that is - will dig into it a bit after > > lunch. > > So here I see us (without LTO) putting DW_AT_location attributes on the > abstract instance copy. That kind-of makes it not abstract anymore, no? > But that way we avoid emitting multiple DIEs for local statics. With > -flto the same problem appears there because we cannot annotate the > early CUs DIE with a location so the concrete instance copy > gets [generated and] the location. > > So while I intended to have the early CUs behave like fully abstract > the actual DWARF is different. I understand that if I emit the early CU as > partial unit it becomes abstract? Well, that's my theory. I've created a minimal dwarf assembler variant corresponding to the C test-case (with only var aaa), and I could reproduce the problem, however after changing the tag to DW_TAG_partial_unit still a symbol table for that partial unit was created. It seems that the inter-cu ref handling code is responsible for that. I'll try to fix this. > Note we do emit DW_AT_const_value > to early optimized out decls - would those still be found when the early CU > is partial [and not imported anywhere]? I think so, but I could check with the dwarf assembler test-case.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-06 11:27 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-04-03 13:22 [Bug debug/94469] New: " vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-06 6:08 ` [Bug debug/94469] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-06 9:32 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-06 9:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-06 9:49 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-06 9:54 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-06 9:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-06 10:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-06 11:27 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2020-04-06 11:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-06 11:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 12:09 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 12:22 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2020-04-07 13:53 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 14:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 15:18 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 15:27 ` vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-08 10:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-94469-4-oC2Uf5j5PF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).