From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 9A8BF3858404; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:16:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9A8BF3858404
From: "bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/94474] Incorrect DWARF range information for inlined
 function
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:16:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-debug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94474-4-YkUO6URd3v@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94474-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94474-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 13:16:56 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94474

--- Comment #14 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> ---
(In reply to Andrew Burgess from comment #0)
>   + This bug report has a bit of history.  Originally there was a GCC
>     patch here:
>        https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01459.html
>     and a reply here:
>        https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01459.html
>=20
>     This led to a GDB patch here:
>        https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01459.html
>     which in turn led to a different GDB patch (adding is-stmt
>     support), here:
>        https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/msg01459.html
>=20

one correction here:
the reply to the oct 2019 patch was here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2019-11/msg01771.html

The follow up GDB patch probably this one is meant:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2019-November/162747.html

The different patch adding is-stmt probably this one is meant:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2019-December/164224.html=