From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 5454A385DC08; Mon,  6 Apr 2020 12:55:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5454A385DC08
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1586177751;
 bh=be0KqZjX5fbRx4Diftk6JpLE7e83mcFW/19nZEItvIw=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=TiRWUISp8V9F36RZKPIy7ZSNU5qfO+4qJELK1LZgrDfdzHvG8qcQW5uLUTt7Dqafi
 RIUkiGcQddgFR+Wp88fKnKO4WS5PrzoLsF4pvLl/XdBGoTEq805K8w7PQdJvHcd8kL
 QgZIa6DTvnPpVZOdEl5uZ+MAQ6JpahHQqrDXf7Ts=
From: "andrew.burgess at embecosm dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/94474] Incorrect DWARF range information for inlined
 function
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:55:51 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-debug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: andrew.burgess at embecosm dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94474-4-vRxpiEQDoV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94474-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94474-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 12:55:51 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94474

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess at embecosm dot com> ---
Bernd,=20

Wouldn't DW_AT_GNU_exit_view be attached to the DW_TAG_inlined_subroutine
though?=20=20

So, as in this case, one subroutine has 2 ranges, but would then have one e=
nd
view number.

I don't understand why each range wouldn't need its own view number?=