From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 6E012385DC1C; Sun, 17 May 2020 09:05:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6E012385DC1C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1589706341;
 bh=DxMLqtAWm1RthfC5GxMGWUYQ3rxILYQzE8mBd2l1UHM=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=HyTWFxagjmSN7pOm892MurYTSCX2m09ZxBdVA9MOlh8Ojn/8BGhkK0EI456DDWCSJ
 XEhp9sc9zE1PoO0lWgNzgfJUjx4GaBHqmN7sZZ8B5dyxnXIRsTtyql+DJRabnPkSb3
 ktmkOH6eZZbxyqsMaZcZ+Qo1QUBu7WNthrXRJcCs=
From: "bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/94474] Incorrect DWARF range information for inlined
 function
Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 09:05:41 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-debug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94474-4-ybEqALtJ9o@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94474-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94474-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 09:05:41 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94474

--- Comment #13 from Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de> ---
Hi Andrew,

You are right about the instruction re-ordering, that is done in
a compiler pass, which simply re-orders RTL instruction lists.
But I think when the code motion happens, we just
have no easy access to the range markers.
And it may be the case that this is-stmt location
mentions a register value that is indeed the parameter
of the inline function, so it may be no instruction but only
a side note, to the debugger, that a certain value would
be already here available in a certain register.
Also that is only a vague guess, since although I did already
a number of gcc patches, I learn new things each time :-)


Bernd.=