From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 2B094385DC00; Sat,  4 Apr 2020 17:33:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2B094385DC00
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1586021636;
 bh=ZDQfO+7sT/AZX2Aj42GLuTWQB2jB18aaYDKwmDGfs48=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=ddYYAxC4pQMYwJdygvG837AcKSqEqRRd8YpxjHDhSac995iNAHRQySpKjWTRSsJqU
 CekTwqTU/eVqjRieOgBcsgX2CAv8WlQOWeTtB7qQPM7oDjbR+nomDykNagu323fzW4
 yz7wzgiX37zUh1PeeBVycz6DVT+NZvxMQ5xtTjss=
From: "evan@coeus-group.com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/94482] Inserting into vector with optimization enabled
 on x86 generates incorrect result
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 17:33:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: evan@coeus-group.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-94482-4-w0DIUYkc3A@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94482-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94482-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 17:33:56 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94482

--- Comment #2 from Evan Nemerson <evan@coeus-group.com> ---
Created attachment 48195
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D48195&action=3Dedit
Output from cc -v

Sure.  It's just -O2, and of course if you're on x86_64 you'll need to pass
-m32.  For example:

  cc -m32 -O2 -o 94482 94482.c

I've attached the output when adding -v.

If you drop either -m32 or -O2 from the flags, the program runs successfull=
y.=20
Otherwise, you'll get an assertion failure:

  94482: 94482.c:46: main: Assertion `r_.i64[0] =3D=3D 1729' failed.
  Aborted (core dumped)=