From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0CB743857020; Thu, 20 Jul 2023 08:38:40 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0CB743857020
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1689842320;
	bh=ao9sYJOZQl5z0lIZHGTatzeuyUgKgvC8IzOFnUmBTbc=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=PMsaLicdcsDLz71qqBS+JABfasIHgs6a29Q9/YM+qFR5IolNdSL9hr7Ild8ymhxrT
	 A8PuEamsxWJsrCBABUjfSDyHADkkRzuUGbG1f1vAAe2OgVtNHY19uj5+KjJv0y0o5q
	 8Rh7siyx/Y5N+x5FZfjk2/WVnddT/fcQtg8kSIuY=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/94497] Branchless clamp in the general case gets a
 branch in a particular case ?
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 08:38:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-94497-4-Q9WtBg8qXI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94497-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94497-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94497

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |14.0
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is now fixed with the fix for PR61747 (this bug would have been a bett=
er
fit though).

Fixed in GCC 14.=