public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/94516] [10 Regression] gnutls test ./psk-file fails since r10-7515-g2c0fa3ecf70d199af18785702e9e0548fd3ab793 Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 07:31:28 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-94516-4-Uj8xVIqFgn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-94516-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94516 --- Comment #18 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af1634f1b555004753a22d1124dbb8419ee095cb commit r11-192-gaf1634f1b555004753a22d1124dbb8419ee095cb Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> Date: Fri May 8 09:30:54 2020 +0200 csa: Fix --enable-checking=yes,df bootstrap failure in csa [PR94961] My recent combine-stack-adj.c change broke df checking bootstrap, while most of the changes are done through validate_change/confirm_changes which update df info, the removal of REG_EQUAL notes didn't update df info. 2020-05-08 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR bootstrap/94961 PR rtl-optimization/94516 * rtl.h (remove_reg_equal_equiv_notes): Add a bool argument defaulted to false. * rtlanal.c (remove_reg_equal_equiv_notes): Add no_rescan argument. Call df_notes_rescan if that argument is not true and returning true. * combine.c (adjust_for_new_dest): Pass true as second argument to remove_reg_equal_equiv_notes. * postreload.c (reload_combine_recognize_pattern): Don't call df_notes_rescan.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-08 7:31 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-04-07 11:52 [Bug rtl-optimization/94516] New: " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 11:54 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/94516] " marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 11:58 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 12:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 12:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 12:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 13:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 14:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 14:35 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 14:55 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 15:05 ` marxin at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-07 15:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-08 10:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-08 19:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-08 20:02 ` law at redhat dot com 2020-04-09 13:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-15 9:44 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-04-20 13:05 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-05-05 14:36 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/94516] [10/11 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-05-05 14:41 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/94516] [10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-05-07 11:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-05-08 7:31 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2020-07-23 6:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-08 12:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2022-06-28 10:40 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-07-07 8:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-94516-4-Uj8xVIqFgn@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).