From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 626B1385DC04; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:20:55 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 626B1385DC04 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1586517655; bh=pAkT6jWzAM37ZfinOY6MUHZbJ/SR0MGthGqLSnQ5knk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dFKV/H1ECQdL7C8rVe9PFQs1p3VULW8vwIlOR5ARK31cS8yaI5XKh5Vzl7EwZMNnP 21YXj10M+ZbBQXlV7LomoAwvm1ai8iO//Dc+mb0ylGz7KOiCon6GRVRVcEXYSUsmBr RgPx1oZWFi2nKQnZhPicnn1yOKN7ovZ9CaVFm9L4= From: "ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/94541] [8/9/10 Regression] -mx32 gcc produces wrong code passing structs by value Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:20:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: MOVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 11:20:55 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94541 --- Comment #16 from Iain Buclaw --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15) > I will fix it in glibc: >=20 > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D25810 Thanks, that certainly explains why I couldn't get it down any further.=