From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 64E09385B835; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 20:20:39 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 64E09385B835 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1586550039; bh=a2G+RLPlXOim+h61BrlY+AJrI9Db8whYZ8nBSLb91MI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dTcmOQB8vnLt5WwPL6v7ld4nOjbs8DngKU4z7vIRKIwiVfks7kmblbfiboCAlbtkB IZD4Nhk9W+ZwArUo3Fk6muHNMudsisK/j/E+UpHz8Ofor8xSKFm2JlMswfsDKlDe3p eznJtbppM/N+xTLAETKzG/Vb+Qr75flUVJRbSs+Y= From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/94554] spurious -Waddress warning within "if constexpr" function-null compares Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 20:20:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 20:20:39 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94554 Marek Polacek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- I don't think this warning should be suppressed in "if constexpr" contexts.= =20 What's the point of such code?=