From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A36FC385DC04; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:32:46 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A36FC385DC04 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587072766; bh=isU3ssKN4x5LuuDXNGQa9R+EBJ44p5Awl6EkasmdAhQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HXgC4ED24eSJc8sNh0LS8Z6zfcc2kZvS3fLsz1cBAWOPVraQvFGYqz5gviw5B6ei2 jEUVQFKEoRAMr04tg+h0lvCWXuvyxAw42ymV6LHUqECgz0DOWwyVnFatsifOQwVOYg l/JNV4n/yg7QtzNfVeEqXu1ez44z4fDyOxw4e13Y= From: "dave.anglin at bell dot net" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'fmaf' Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:32:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dave.anglin at bell dot net X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:32:46 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94586 --- Comment #23 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2020-04-16 5:07 p.m., sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > It is unclear to me if the patch will meet everyone's > expectation. In particular, there are currently no=20 > target-specific macros used in the Fortran frontend. > Using 'defined(__hpux__)' may make some unhappy as=20 > it now complicates maintenance and adding new Fortran > features. Can I include "../../libgfortran/libgfortran.h" in these frontend routines?= =C2=A0 This would pull in the defines for GFC_REAL_16_IS_FLOAT128 and GFC_REAL_16_IS_LONG_DOUBLE.=