From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id F00CD385DC0C; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:51:58 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F00CD385DC0C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1586850718;
 bh=uOYgZl6YQygvkTYA3tHwTIAk9mAaedosN1t9ZLazwUE=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=xhAkES7ps0XsBjKmJV8M39cbWO5pTodXZj5DZ0SQHb9Te0tnojnaNWwMmOyQo2NaJ
 2OLh4i4/cF9kl78kUaq4/hWf6Mlu7rSzVso75iDf1GOlwDquj76rFOQDpJzLQBVUpL
 JRuYiOd3UVK3OM8d5n0QW5s/INLxbrFnfPb89OzI=
From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/94586] trigd_lib.inc:84:28: error: implicit
 declaration of function 'fmaf'
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:51:58 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94586-4-WT7fEhC8a2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94586-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94586-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:51:59 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94586

--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> -=
--
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 07:23:32AM +0000, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94586
>=20
> --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Not all targets have a C99 math runtime.  libgfortran configury tests for=
 a
> load
> of C99 functions:
>=20
> # Check for C99 (and other IEEE) math functions
> GCC_CHECK_MATH_FUNC([acosf])
> GCC_CHECK_MATH_FUNC([acos])
> GCC_CHECK_MATH_FUNC([acosl])
> GCC_CHECK_MATH_FUNC([acoshf])
> ...
>=20
> but fails to check for fma[lf ] (I also don't see any uses of the HAVE_*
> macros defined but that's another issue.
>=20

It is 2020.  If a target doesn't support C99, then
building gfortran should be prohibited.  The file=20
libgfortran/intrinsics/c99_functions.c is nothing=20
but a kludge, and I wrote a part of that file!

I also note that FreeBSD does not have a complete
C99 and building libstdc++ is broken because of=20
this.  Yet, I can't get a trivially stupid patch
applied.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D89991=