From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 19C4E385DC0F; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:15:51 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 19C4E385DC0F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1586859351;
 bh=s0nerZygxLThonwl4WM6Gq5oE0iqoIR2qv1vJGuUx4w=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=OzkbC6LyB3uzTPHPXgqDYLmEFscu7Kca8BuaDMShnPgZ9eLkJQNePSProiXD+JuA/
 ZKxK30dQL2L6tisMg0ItpqQGCPksZBpXCDk3JtufVrzgaWP/0yaL+XB+pm1SsyXBRl
 eVwOl4RQA1nmTleTo+ef5tr2DM1A69EPl52J/oQA=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/94590] Incorrectly accepts invalid C++11 braced
 initialisation of double from long double if sizeof(long
 double)==sizeof(double)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:15:50 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords bug_status everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-94590-4-EAMfcKPjWr@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94590-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94590-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:15:51 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94590

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |accepts-invalid
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-04-14

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Giuseppe D'Angelo from comment #0)
> +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #92856 +++
>=20
> (Sorry, couldn't find a way to reopen _that_ bug, so creating a new one)

Good, it's not the same bug. That one said we should give an error not a
warning, which is wrong.

This one says we should give a diagnostic irrespective of target, which is
correct.=