From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 81D0B385DC23; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:57:02 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 81D0B385DC23 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1586973422; bh=pQ6mmdbixUFsmZA3tphTyVunbY8v1Y2v7QWxxn2D+nQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fMIIbQZLuAFD30JH/HhF3UL7P0K6MfvpBRz7Kw/E8V+431Q1MsddpqYCxo2NgK4hn tIqHhRJNRlK+BbF+YTn4k/OJh5tfzTQWf6unYWAFi2rOmsM0G6By5Ufu37kA9o3Gqj pOCG6vpWAUmHvaghVEsDSP8qtpZpcRzTxGdVyXuM= From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/94592] [10 Regression] ICE in non-type template parameter with constexpr constructor Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:57:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:57:02 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94592 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Another problematical testcase: struct A { int i; constexpr A(int n) : i(n) {} }; template struct B { int i; constexpr B() : i(a.i) { } }; template void bar () { B<{1}> var; } void fu() { bar(); }=