From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BC1F43870847; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:05:35 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BC1F43870847 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587481535; bh=i5DXFRmWjDwlnOzVc7V4kzfWWyxmflNhjiQHTF+i07s=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Gy4dKZHgvHirlPcqeJMneSeCe2TPKZG88n4dEJHxsgdAHHBP7nHvagSzpHRBQniql /jRF/nJsxgZX+m9n0zEGK7g+ORpAJjaS5dMlw/S27Gu1meiP2iQWrBmPCH8aSfv2dx CEC+4BAjoUJ9c8ZTPczOA+Qi/H6QB9XrzFhpl7+E= From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/94597] [10 Regression] ICE while using a concept checking for user defined conversion operator since r10-3735-gcb57504a55015891 Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:05:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:05:35 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94597 Patrick Palka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka --- Fixed. I think the reduced testcase in #c1 is invalid as-is -- the requirement "e.operator c;" should be "e.operator c();", because according to [expr.ref= ]: [The expression E1.E2 where E2 refers to a non-static member function] c= an be used only as the left-hand operand of a member function call. I committed the reduced testcase with that change.=