From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 774E0384A041; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:38:52 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 774E0384A041
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1586957932;
 bh=FleX9p5aLB+15q6ae8oZcUzIugRIhNPc5+cJcMbyANc=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=auDyW613tlsB6xFNNnWRu/Vqc08pT9HiqDt9YL/zBr3Hgk34M4TQEzH1Gu8ceaJiq
 THT2Lnx/2EFIR+jRFQhMuHaAED6u71I14cKuiyZ2o2FOBDjewdiil4VdSqy94OexLY
 O+G9kqiuk+VF2f3GoJXpSSmVfcGV/8wAv2X0+4oY=
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/94598] [10 Regression] ICE in
 verify_sra_access_forest, at tree-sra.c:2360 with -O1 or higher since
 r10-6321-g636e80eea24b780f
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:38:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94598-4-NSoL5igQYs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94598-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94598-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:38:52 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94598

--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm going to test the following:

--- a/gcc/tree-sra.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-sra.c
@@ -2357,9 +2357,11 @@ verify_sra_access_forest (struct access *root)
       gcc_assert (base =3D=3D first_base);
       gcc_assert (offset =3D=3D access->offset);
       gcc_assert (access->grp_unscalarizable_region
+                 || access->grp_total_scalarization
                  || size =3D=3D max_size);
-      gcc_assert (!is_gimple_reg_type (access->type)
-                 || max_size =3D=3D access->size);
+      gcc_assert (!access->grp_unscalarizable_region
+                 || !is_gimple_reg_type (access->type)
+                 || size =3D=3D access->size);
       gcc_assert (reverse =3D=3D access->reverse);

       if (access->first_child)=