From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 40539386EC40; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:07:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 40539386EC40
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1587028038;
 bh=AyJElek6LL6TirrN9YVc8wkVqmKiQUUDRKjtbfuKMKU=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=Gav+SHhtCjVu5tW4ph/48Pn69Ms002hLaD+8aVMIwVosrYCggNEED0EyADJjYOGfl
 pA4NZrDm4518nPZLUcnSk5SRNcbJ5ndNcjcj6XBeHsng9ywUksp86ZuHYVKiIqLbuz
 G8Eh/LDA94hzpHtoF8Jy78a+Z7L9m3Myyvi83RkU=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/94598] [10 Regression] ICE in
 verify_sra_access_forest, at tree-sra.c:2360 with -O1 or higher since
 r10-6321-g636e80eea24b780f
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:07:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94598-4-XZjSP2YfiT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94598-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94598-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 09:07:18 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94598

--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor <jamborm@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bd87b1fddbbe7d424671ebf81c96e12d748fafc7

commit r10-7751-gbd87b1fddbbe7d424671ebf81c96e12d748fafc7
Author: Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
Date:   Thu Apr 16 11:04:41 2020 +0200

    sra: Fix access verification (PR 94598)

    get_ref_base_and_extent recognizes ARRAY_REFs with variable index but
    into arrays of length one as constant offset accesses.  However,
    max_size in such cases is extended to span the whole element.  This
    confuses SRA verification when SRA also builds its (total
    scalarization) access structures to describe fields under such array -
    get_ref_base_and_extent returns different size and max_size for them.

    Fixed by not performing the check for total scalarization accesses.
    The subsequent check then had to be changed to use size and not
    max_size too, which meant it has to be skipped when the access
    structure describes a genuine variable array access.

    Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux.

    2020-04-16  Martin Jambor  <mjambor@suse.cz>

            PR tree-optimization/94598
            * tree-sra.c (verify_sra_access_forest): Fix verification of to=
tal
            scalarization accesses under access to one-element arrays.

            testsuite/
            * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94598.c: New test.=