From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 9C95F385DC06; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:15:34 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9C95F385DC06
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1586931334;
 bh=KeetIOpE8vAFaBtlXeMiVEJaj08gmaU7S9opY2HqISs=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=m1m28B/xQAN9pzbUnjAczhSpMsZKrtjLrhzY8af86/zMXboYpftgPJJuCIKxQVOaQ
 sxe3pWxUwMzuSpTyJ8UX4Tjo8UyAgqXbLOWgGqr0pZyMReb9baD+oIuCYndhkKtq+9
 azUbuASsXTzcnPsOfUnH5lErYQCnPYDqYtM3S/N4=
From: "frankhb1989 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/94602] New: wrong semantic check to prvalue as decltype
 operand
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:15:34 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: frankhb1989 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-94602-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:15:34 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94602

            Bug ID: 94602
           Summary: wrong semantic check to prvalue as decltype operand
           Product: gcc
           Version: 9.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: frankhb1989 at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Case:

struct S
{
    ~S() =3D delete;=20=20=20=20
};
S f();
int main()
{
    using X =3D decltype(f()); // #1
    using Y =3D decltype(S{}); // #2
}

#2 is wrongly rejected in C++17 mode.

#1 is not ill-formed for the deleted destructor as per C++11
[dcl.type.simple]/5:

> ... in the case where the operand of a decltype-specifier
is a function call and the return type of the function is a class type, a
special rule (5.2.2) ensures that the return type is not required to be
complete (as it would be if the call appeared in a sub-expression or outsid=
e of
a
decltype-specifier) ... In particular, it is not necessary to allocate stor=
age
for a temporary object or to enforce the semantic constraints associated wi=
th
invoking the type's destructor. ...

This rule is expanded by P0135R1 for cases like #2, which is adopted in C++=
17.

(See also P0929R2.)=