From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9EC2D385E00C; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:53:50 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9EC2D385E00C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587401630; bh=usAoF6x42Cfi6QgMkqE22OkOJ2P3vg8DX8cd1Jir52M=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=k2iYfmiQWfLX+/+2ItmJe4Fl97CcSFjl6pcWRazOT5nkks4dA093iRmHY+Fe/v+j4 ExrFDZkmiygduq6VpLbvdLdWl1LPSaormJsjHMGeCOA+L43UAqHBNiwU1vODFPaJqH hj+BiA10U/On0T4iHqPMLeSnPCP9z1MiZ/rEWGAg= From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug d/94623] ice for ./gdc.test/compilable/interpret3.d Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:53:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: d X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:53:50 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94623 --- Comment #13 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #12) > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #11) > > Checking flag "extra" is the one. >=20 > Without knowing too much about what that checking flag does. That would = be > highly odd if that were the case, as the dmd implementation sits "outside" > of gcc. >=20 > The only bridge that is connecting the two is d/d-system.h, which does so= me > necessary #define's to fix portability and use of gcc_assert. A possible next step is for you to try a build with checking flag extra switched on and see what happens. At least that would confirm or deny what I am seeing here. I don't think bootstrap is required.=