From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 515FA3858D35; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:51:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 515FA3858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1587397880;
 bh=iOPUlvKWonvPZH4Z1noc9V4NvySvDGIIQU6xwF20HmY=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=hH5oCbi5aI4WtCNZC/PO8IVvJj8aCRDaXJOCS3HZXfog5BeWGJDa8+WmbqNwnHREN
 VSHF7opCimKAyDT/gH3VAnoMipMzi3kHNPcCccMicx2rVEGe4vw4FjGVr9MYaL3mnq
 4Fbq6QiNs6wjqlblwQZLDdF0ojEbvp4lSuU377II=
From: "ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug d/94623] ice for ./gdc.test/compilable/interpret3.d
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:51:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: d
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94623-4-dxgFHD1VaL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94623-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94623-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:51:20 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94623

--- Comment #12 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org> ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #11)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #10)
> > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #6)
> > > I'll reduce the checking flags down to "no" and see what happens.
> >=20
> > It works fine. So it looks like one of the checking flags=20
> > (df,extra,fold,rtl,yes) breaks it.
> >=20
> > It will take a few hours, but I'll try to find out which one.
>=20
> Checking flag "extra" is the one.

Without knowing too much about what that checking flag does.  That would be
highly odd if that were the case, as the dmd implementation sits "outside" =
of
gcc.

The only bridge that is connecting the two is d/d-system.h, which does some
necessary #define's to fix portability and use of gcc_assert.=