From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 01CBD386F430; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:20:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 01CBD386F430 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587414032; bh=fpQj7gOJJwRSoSA/Z7JglQ1YKolZuPySCKm+Pkvo138=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jJ3jqdWYYGvDYmpMDr3mWWxyaWvzsPGJ1A95wQXnyd+wfAqtUDpDRHl8cKLINK7Zi Guii3kIFDiZ/Q7UkBRmOl+G4T7dAG8c2UsdndNDwjVYzok8ZPksqRk/JleE+N+md2F bwQJLjoF1h57C7geRpVqVUw+prxiO9Wt9INcebaY= From: "ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug d/94623] ice for ./gdc.test/compilable/interpret3.d Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:20:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: d X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:20:32 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94623 --- Comment #20 from Iain Buclaw --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #19) > (In reply to ibuclaw from comment #17) > > (In reply to David Binderman from comment #16) > > >=20 > > > I am struggling to understand what this output means: > > >=20 > > It's picking up the modules from a system location. These most certain= ly > > don't belong to the gdc compiler. Which bad package maintainer is > > installing compiler-specific modules in a common location? LDC? >=20 > I have package ldc-druntime-devel version 1.15.0 installed,=20 > so that looks to be the source of the problem. Yes, that would most certainly be the case. I can apply the patch anyway, as it's good to not ICE. However it won't prevent the possibility of linker errors due to mismatches in ldc-druntime-= dev and libgphobos.=