From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 4CBCB385DC24; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:10:10 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4CBCB385DC24
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1587409810;
 bh=YcPvXXr3DBA6dw7nU+DJ8Et7xdPHej9ngZonBymwoII=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=nr8oBKUsNB0F5C7Q4AAjHC/ZjbyPosqsvM7sBHtKGDreD1DuhAhK1jRS5w4OL3qqd
 abU0BpRpgSoyHOQRIpEiGEa23YzkQ0dlpaL7kH93v1bCrdlLWlWOU2OhLTGAbhOJT1
 WKVfDhnF9nJuIiiPfpSqUMsA75Bcx4R9QmMhbuuo=
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/94628] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in invalid_nonstatic_memfn_p
 at cp/typeck.c:1979 since r9-640-g1268ecc26fc1289b
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:10:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94628-4-ZKKGuJ9F39@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94628-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94628-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 19:10:10 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94628

--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Nicholas Krause from comment #9)
> Created attachment 48318 [details]
> Possible Fix

No, it's not a fix, it just replaces an ICE with another ICE, as Martin alr=
eady
pointed out:

94628-3.C:5:40: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
template_type_parm or template_template_parm or bound_template_template_par=
m,
have=20
nontype_argument_pack in instantiation_dependent_r, at cp/pt.c:26950

and doesn't fix the rejects-valid testcase, either.

How many times do you have to be told to test your patches?  Besides, Patri=
ck
is already working on this PR.=