From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DC481385DC1F; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:13:04 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DC481385DC1F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587125584; bh=q0XthCIONtgwqvp3NfUGr4diCCOzIy6P6kAy8KWykUQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=V1Cfs88IG/cbZDpaC+DWx+e3gODEjAWiMFtnnVVCgNJI+JtvVetkdDIZZ/L5M/25m yL5tAK+3ial+/5roXVjxenYQpxxzCXcuN8Pe2CszCRkiG7rcydiTVAeRN0HZnAlO2a RZW/GEnCsvr4+YxJsFuiqJUpgen5jPUkgX5h3Hus= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/94629] 10 issues located by the PVS-studio static analyzer Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:13:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:13:05 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94629 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Andrew Stubbs from comment #11) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > > or if instead we should drop the "status =3D " for the cases where noth= ing > > checks it. Andrew? >=20 > I think checking the status is probably good practice, even though I don't > think there's an actual bug here. I have no way to test it, so if you want and can test it (perhaps with other changes), please take it over, or we throw it away, we don't have to fix all the warnings, we just should skim through it to find if there aren't any ac= tual bugs.=