From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 90024385840C; Sat, 20 Jan 2024 20:45:24 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 90024385840C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1705783524;
	bh=qR9jRcUe94YbIQPrtC1t9ZxF8QiCKCznsnPZopnGGL4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=E1iULEoB8KudACl6NXxiobREW+JfjNBb4tYKGIzjt0IX15rAQBcqdBCuOCJhZsKX6
	 Xv0TuwUMKbQxzIzcefvZ3VzOfS5exUTfm4oewzMNSPV3C1sxoKpav3xejZwICqzs9Z
	 bylIuJsQwIRNxg6mPnN0iIk8KwHyk5M17+BG6cZE=
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug other/94629] 10 issues located by the PVS-studio static
 analyzer
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 20:45:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: other
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94629-4-TqAtnC0Y4M@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94629-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94629-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94629

--- Comment #28 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #27)
> The original article checked gcc-10.
> gcc-13 is checked in the following article:
>=20
> https://pvs-studio.com/en/blog/posts/cpp/1067/
>=20
> I suspect it would be most unwise if any release of gcc after 13=20
> introduced new bugs that were known to pvs-studio.

And is there already a bugzilla bug about these (or should I create one)?
I believe a new one would be better than re-using this one.=