public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bugdal at aerifal dot cx" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/94631] New: Wrong codegen for arithmetic on bitfields
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 04:53:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-94631-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94631

            Bug ID: 94631
           Summary: Wrong codegen for arithmetic on bitfields
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: bugdal at aerifal dot cx
  Target Milestone: ---

Test case:

struct foo {
        unsigned long long low:12, hi:52;
};
unsigned long long bar(struct foo *p)
{
        return p->hi*4096;
}

Should generate only a mask off of the low bits, but gcc generates code to mask
off the low 12 bits and the high 12 bits (reducing the result to 52 bits).
Presumably GCC is interpreting the expression p->hi as having a phantom type
that's only 52 bits wide, rather than having type unsigned long long.

clang/LLVM compiles it correctly.

I don't believe there's any language in the standard supporting what GCC is
doing here.

             reply	other threads:[~2020-04-17  4:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-17  4:53 bugdal at aerifal dot cx [this message]
2020-04-17  5:09 ` [Bug c/94631] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-17  5:17 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2020-04-17  5:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-17  8:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-17 15:55 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2020-04-17 20:43 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2020-04-17 20:50 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2020-04-17 20:54 ` bugdal at aerifal dot cx
2022-10-26  0:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-94631-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).