From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 579A4386F824; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:17:12 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 579A4386F824 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587482232; bh=RT8/iLnWkbJTtWtjHEiU1jpEWkCeivZv1cdRW45oapA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ZvIji1lxQVBnVdjAbIxvOQq1G/q40ds3JbVn6luzBVMDj+DPj0n/5evdnaKw00Lu0 Kb3bIW3ihkRaD/WW/fLeChVdK38HFXNDMEBZu9GCotcrktfBDFLhaRNiB9RhB7FfKp 8+oNsBMnamOoni9EvjoMVqPDSkUhdopaygY/Kfxw= From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/94645] [10 Regression][concepts] incorrect concept evaluation with decltype, plus internal error since r10-7554-gf1ad7bac76b66257 Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:17:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:17:12 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94645 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka --- As in PR94597, I think the testcases here in #c0 and #c2 might be invalid a= s-is -- the requirement "t.cend;" should probably be "t.cend();", and we reject = the former since r10-7554. With that minor change we successfully compile the reduced testcase, but we still get the same ICE with the original testcase.=