From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AC13B3851427; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:28:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AC13B3851427 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587367681; bh=KlhCM0A2Uuw/BJRA2KqjFRC0kiiRU9+nlI3p6/5odqo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TRQYlhJPCvMBWGCs1vZSnfbeq9O7el0/eqBlR14pXpm1gTraQjj9rxHJ9Ckpisdyi 2f4c4bMUF38BJSUS+d0Eaoq6Y4MYmTr0dPDogxxAFsrWc/zpkwTbnkwNTm8dRyhvp8 uXhPfMMW0uBcZJFIGZ0s/4uBxL4ESv9eBA0dpi/A= From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/94645] [10 Regression][concepts] incorrect concept evaluation with decltype, plus internal error Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:28:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 07:28:01 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94645 Martin Li=C5=A1ka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2020-04-20 Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING --- Comment #3 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- Are you sure the reduced test-case can be compiled with gcc 9?=