From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C19773858D31; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:35:56 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C19773858D31 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587404156; bh=TXFIF8hKZ/e+Db/SuiL2EXxDeQCnkSyn3LC1zTZ3LK0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=efDOCSMyFTFErGyteo9ragAijzQ9+PfBGABylSCstSDwyWO3QDm2ShFsIfbeeg4D8 CysQ5hJdq12tnXjVNoWlrgRTXkJKjBs4q7mVnyVbrjLGHvBfpjFl3Qf4qSVrDdsdYv ySyyPavrZyf3aMI2aWOFYe+8m0JcrjWZz+DulYwA= From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/94647] [10 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds on strncpy into a larger member array from a smaller array Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:35:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 17:35:56 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94647 Martin Sebor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot g= nu.org --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- I'm testing a patch. -Warray-bounds (and all other similar warnigs) only considers valid accesse= s to trailing arrays with zero or one element.=