From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 86FCD386EC6D; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:37:49 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 86FCD386EC6D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587382669; bh=/UVEKMAw/brzEhmZxyr2JQ67qDmP7QltwSlEE6WTluo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BGt1gJGangASFSyFAaj4SMJFcO+Wt13EpKUa3tzmEYvSHjSvhNkrRR0w9fVVXTzTt Rmk5eFp/c9Lbrs+8QDcEqLg2Zjuo8Wep4+PpPtGWnqVbxBSDmYewWpmalRxsTV0pyW Hg06EtjKqv3hDXtjdZRH5Mhp6feEGsxsyV1UqE/w= From: "avi@cloudius-systems.com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/94649] 16-byte aligned atomic_compare_exchange doesn not generate cmpxcg16b on x86_64 Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:37:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: avi@cloudius-systems.com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:37:49 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94649 --- Comment #2 from Avi Kivity --- Maybe we can have a new flag -mcx16all that assumes that all code using 16-= byte CAS is compiled with the flag.=