From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C68613858CDB; Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:56:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C68613858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1676458578;
	bh=9DEMpL7Ah0HBVG3e6Q12Ne9iyO2eaSeFDSgeYnYj46M=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=iLKln6SLOsUjaFxHoYR9MzbntDoh1SLtkF+0M09AB9M9p2saqQLpV+SymWrP6Pyd/
	 B/pmbp6xooW6oS/rNc8zbDky7zy70Eksy23dp0bYrgPmJ6PRjOB5PulEQJrXr9pE9c
	 OVxQt+4ksKKj1H8rMKtFt0U01uD1hTJcoM+FrGqQ=
From: "balder at yahooinc dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/94649] 16-byte aligned atomic_compare_exchange doesn not
 generate cmpxcg16b on x86_64
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 10:56:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: balder at yahooinc dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94649-4-jRfiuekSJz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94649-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94649-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94649

--- Comment #5 from Henning Baldersheim <balder at yahooinc dot com> ---
Are there any next steps here.
This is still an issue at least with gcc-12. It would be nice to get rid of=
 the
hacks we have to avoid it.=