From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 6D91B3858D31; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:47:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6D91B3858D31
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1587365251;
 bh=Da8/hXqTZrmFsv2qUHefwodNmExlZbnVI3voOEGqhXI=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=OCIN+f+HztoZk627qbxJJfVzMkZMqkxGAgGPBPfcdDBZZBgtdaw63rRLEoWWvqWS9
 4WvsA1hmg52XJancjc94VBf2RRZfdkIZhwAEzwaxAAos/30xP59g/aDVjX9WsuK0ic
 epWAyc+jBFmiIocT/RhmlFJO3KfNezdBtAW1lkmg=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/94665] missed minmax optimization opportunity
 for if/else structure.
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:47:31 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-94665-4-ELZIGhQ0Zt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94665-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94665-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 06:47:31 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94665

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2)
> If vara is a NaN, this is not the same; it needs -ffinite-math-only.
> And in fact adding that option does the trick (on powerpc that is, I
> don't have an aarch64 Fortran handy).
>=20
> Could you check this please?

I was testing and it is done with -ffinite-math-only as it done on the gimp=
le
level as I mentioned in my comment #1 just before you did your comment.=