From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C800F386F031; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:09:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C800F386F031 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1587380982; bh=q3tGlXPCzU44ngd+XVbkD6UIWzF25WAUFtzZSbc1d2Q=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NGZoR7AN90VC85Ag0dn2XDrN/QYgx9V1TdtFi49dGS/1kv85Q61498F2SbHFvVJm1 i9pehoD2Vg1s7BdwgZXKQHI2iW2IDqLQ9Rrg+zzuWaqR+a3tsgdwZ3BhTCRPbKXrA3 5k/wgkpq+8mG42DRnP8Fc/4kwU6q/MJqM0EclK0s= From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/94665] missed minmax optimization opportunity for if/else structure. Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:09:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 11:09:42 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94665 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- Can r94 or r93 be NaN there? (I should build an aarch64 compiler... takes almost a day though :-) )=