From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id 1737D3858405; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 17:48:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1737D3858405
From: "ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/94673] [concepts] What is the return type of local
 parameters of requires expressions?
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 17:48:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-94673-4-HKyQrVxhXI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94673-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94673-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 17:48:46 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94673

Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to gcc-bugs from comment #3)
> I think this bug should be changed to a request to improve the diagnostic=
s.
>=20
> The diagnostic says:
>=20
> ```
> <source>:13:15: note: constraints not satisfied
> <source>:8:9:   required by the constraints of 'template<class t> concept
> foo'
> <source>:8:15:   in requirements with 't v' [with t =3D int]
> <source>:10:6: note: 'v' does not satisfy return-type-requirement
>    10 |     {v} -> same_as<t>;
>       |      ^
> ```
>=20
> If you don't know that `{v}` should be read as `{(v)}`, it is confusing t=
hat
> the diagnostic says that `'t v' [with t =3D int]` does not satisfy that t=
he
> type of the expression `{ v }` is `t`.
>=20
> I think the diagnostic for the return-type-requirement should add the rea=
son
> / diagnostic why it isn't fulfilled, so basically the same reason that
> `static_assert(std::same_as<decltype((v)), int>);` would give.
>=20
> > note: the expression 'is_same_v<_Tp, _Up> [with _Tp =3D int&; _Up =3D i=
nt]' evaluated to 'false'
> >   57 |       concept __same_as =3D std::is_same_v<_Tp, _Up>;
> >      |                           ~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Don't we already do this with -fconcepts-diagnostics-depth=3D2 ?=