From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id C0B9B386F43C; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 06:51:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C0B9B386F43C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
 s=default; t=1587451886;
 bh=dUEibmFYihZekv65Os2KEpum0OtwWLzun9gHstwxhZE=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=DxBfj3D/5MZuG1q0qpy9IekOFYCKXlYNiNuQrBUB/vI1byO8CKmTkreAEAyHmuM0R
 33u9QrQcE8Elxa0JYAgpQd/Jod9Vin/AlJ0hlkxf4O82ghwaLuj4brKw4J+5vfKVfn
 8LSxMrMX00exfsQTn6WQgImXYTU3Mf06s+jqGCyE=
From: "chantry.xavier at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/94675] [9 regression] -Warray-bounds false
 positive with -O2
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 06:51:26 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: chantry.xavier at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-94675-4-7dIlD1wFts@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-94675-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-94675-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 06:51:26 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D94675

--- Comment #2 from Xavier <chantry.xavier at gmail dot com> ---
Note that in our code, we are not even dereferencing the pointer, it's just
ps->s +=3D len.

And since we always keep a pointer right after the array (p_end / s_end), w=
on't
that be a source of problems for Warray-bounds ?=